# AI Visibility and Citation Plan

**Business · market · observation dates**

Lead with the strongest supported conclusion and any incomplete coverage.
Then show each engine separately:

| Engine | Usable / attempted / planned | Mentioned | Recommended | First | Owned site cited |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Counts are x/n of usable buyer answers. Citation coverage has its own known
denominator; missing data is not zero. No combined score.

## Three next actions

| Priority | Page and exact change | Supporting evidence | Effort / owner | Recheck condition |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Fewer than three is fine when evidence is thin.

## Citation opportunities

| Page | Buyer citations by engine | Source-pass citations | Checked gap | Public contact source | Proposed action |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Include only verified public contacts. Attach drafts separately, never imply
they were sent.

## Buyer questions and competitors

Show exact questions and per-engine/per-question x/n for target and rivals.
Include the short exact recommendation quotes and whether order was explicit.

## Asked by name

| Engine | Claim / quote | Verified fact | Official source | Finding |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

## Recheck

Date, changes and dates, same saved plan, current estimate and approval needed.
If comparable, before/after counts with denominators. If not, explain the
changed setting, coverage gap or model change and start a new baseline.

## Evidence and limits

Requested settings versus observed model/locale, sample method, missing or
failed runs, citation coverage, opened page dates, run receipts and exact total.
Answers vary, this is a small logged-out sample, and before/after association
does not establish that the changes caused an improvement.